On May 9, 12:30 am, Douglas Richardson <royalances...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
< Dear Newsgroup ~
<
< As a followup to my earlier post, I should note that the National
< Archives catalogue has an entry for an inquisition post mortem for
< Maud widow of Thomas de Swynnerton as follows:
<
< Item details C 135/164/20
<
< Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
I checked the published transcript of the IPM of Maud, widow of Thomas
de Swinnerton, mentioned above. The IPM indicates that this woman was
previously the wife of John le Latimer, of Northampton****re, hence her
interest in properties in that county. John le Latimer was identified
in the inquisityion as her first husband. Complete Peerage sub
Latimer and Canon Bridgeman elsewhere indicate that this lady was a
different person than Maud de Holand, who was the wife successively of
John de Mowbray, Knt., 3rd Lord Mowbray, and Sir Thomas de Swinnerton,
Knt., 3rd Lord Swinnerton.
When you have a minute, I'd certainly appreciate hearing from a few
of you newsgroup members who descend from Maud de Holand. I'm
distantly related to you, as I descend from Maud de Holand's sister,
Elizabeth de Holand, who married Sir Henry Fitz Roger, of Somerset.
Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
|
