Will,
I don't need to prove anything to anyone. If you read my posting on the
list I said this was a working FTM which is available for correcting
anything that is not correct.
It does amaze me Will where you take one so called authority over other
ones. We all know we can't believe everything that we read. There are
mistakes made through all of these genealogies that we research on. I try
my best to find records I can believe. That is why I threw those pedigrees
out. So, I could get a feeling for what is correct and what is not. I
don't think that is that hard to understand.
So, what do you rely on for authority on these pedigrees besides Google
Books ? There is Burke's Peerage. What else do you use so the rest of us
know where to g to find correct records ? Please list them for all of us.
:)
Marianne Dillow
wjhonson <wjhonson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On May 12, 6:40 pm, marianne dillow wrote:
> I've seen this on Barack. I emailed this guy and he never returned my
email. I don't know if this guy knows anymore than anybody else. He works
for the Library of Congress. I don't know if his work is correct or not.
>
> ----------------
>
> Perhaps. But I find it a bit interesting that W.A.R. doesn't seem to
> know or even imply that this Edwin Conway is of a well-heeled family.
> See
>
> #14182http://www.wargs.com/political/obama.html
> "Ancestry of Barack Obama", by William Addams Reitwiesner
---------------
William Addams Reitwiesner is not always correct, but his work is
respected and respectable. He oftener than not, cites his sources.
Now it's your turn. If you want to challenge what he says, you will
need to *cite your sources*
Will Johnson
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|
