Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, Medieval > RE: Another C.P...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 22361 of 22932
Post > Topic >>

RE: Another C.P. Addition: Maud de Holand,

by "Peter G R Howarth" <pgrhowarth@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 10:20 AM

On Mon 12/05/2008 23:22 "Douglas Richardson" <royalan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>There were three Maud de Swinnerton's who occur in this time period,
>not necessarily at the same time.
>
>The first Maud de Swinnerton was Maud, widow of Roger de Swinnerton,
>Knt.  She held a third part of the manor of Swinnerton, Stafford****re
>in dower.  She occurs in deeds dated 1326-27 and 1356-57, and bore a
>bend as her arms-see Bridgeman, Fam. of Swynnerton (Colls. Hist.
>Staffs. 7(2)) (1886): 26-27, 39, 41-42).  I presume she is the Lady
>Maud Swinnerton who presented to Swinnerton church in 1358.
>
>The second Maud de Swinnerton was Maud de Holand, wife successively of
>John de Mowbray, Knt., 3rd Lord Mowbray, and Thomas de Swinnerton,
>Knt., 3rd Lord Swinnerton.  This Maud's husband Thomas de Swinenrton
>was was the brother of Roger de Swinnerton, Knt. named above.    Maud
>de Holand was living in 1342, as stated in my first post.  There is no
>evidence that she survived her husband, Thomas de Swinnerton, who died
>in 1361.  For all I know, she could well have predeceased him.
>
>Finally there was a Maud, wife successively of John le Latimer (died
>1356) and Thomas de Swinnerton.  She died as Thomas' widow in 1360.
>Canon Bridgeman identified her husband, Thomas de Swinnerton, as
>probably the son of Richard, son of Roger de Swinnerton, of
>Swinnerton.  For particulars of this lady, see Complete Peerage, 7
>(1929): 454 (sub Latimer).
>
>Alan Grey is correct that it is impossible to tell which Maud de
>Swinnerton is the one that is mentioned in the record dated 38 Edward
>III (i.e., 1364-1365).  It could be either Maud#1 or Maud#2.  However,
>since we have no evidence that Maud#2 survived her husband, my guess
>is that the lady living in 1364-1365 was Maud#1.  That's purely a
>guess.
>
>Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

I too found Alan Grey's extremely full details most helpful.  So have I
understood your comments here correctly: we should now amend your previous
suggestion for the date of death of Maud de Holand to some time between 13
March 1342/3 and 10 May 1380?

Many thanks for your work on her life and marriages.

Peter G R Howarth
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
RE: Another C.P. Addition: Maud de Holand,
"Peter G R Howarth&q  2008-05-13 10:20:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 2:59:23 CDT 2008.