Re: Another C.P. Addition: Margaret Neville, wife of Sir William

On May 16, 11:18 pm, Douglas Richardson <royalances...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 16, 11:14 pm, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> < However, you are insisting that we all be credulous, which is not
> your prerogative.
>
>
> Not at all, taf.  You can be an illogical as you like.  It still
> doesn't change the evidence.

Whatever that evidence might be. Unfortunately, the only person in
this discussion who has seen the evidence has been dead for 115 years,
and you have no idea what it was that she saw.   Surely the evidence
hasn't changed, but you wouldn't know if it had, since you are simply
taking someone else's word that it exists, and that it is helpful to
your cause. it is not illogical to reject such hearsay as proof of a
guess. It is prudence.

taf