Re: Another C.P. Addition: Margaret Neville, wife of Sir William

On May 16, 11:16 pm, Douglas Richardson <royalances...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 16, 11:10 pm, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> < Ah, yes. When he has no evidence to sup****t his position, it is the
> < fault of others for not having weblinks. When he demands that others
> < produce medieval do***ents, and the best he can do is a 19th century
> < gossip rag, it is the fault of the critics.
>
> I presented sufficient evidence to prove my case.

You presented evidence that the Nevilles had a daughter with that
name.  You presented evidence that the Earl of March made a grant to
Margaret wife of Lucy. Taken together, these hardly constitute proof.
What do you add to go over the top? The word of a 19th century author
of children's books, stating that a do***ent you feel not worth
consulting 'confirmed' her hypothesis that it was Margaret Neville who
married Lucy. That is enough to suggest that you may be on the right
track, but proof?  Hardly.  Given the demands you make of others, a
double standard?  Certainly.

taf