On Jun 15, 7:03 am, Nathaniel Taylor <nltay...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Isn't this reflected in some of the bad 20th century compendia (perhaps
> Garcia Carraffa)? Don't suppose any of your 19th-c. sources quotes a
> trove of do***ents sup****ting such a line?
Of course. Actually, the source I had in mind was 18th century, and it
gave the line in full, with the exception that it shows infante Ordono
Ramirez as son of Ramiro II rather than Ramiro III (but a few pages
later corrects this error), then follows it right down through Ordono
Ordonez, count Garcia Ordonez, "Fernan Garcia" (i.e. de Hita) and
Gutierre Fernandez (de Castro) to Rodrigo (Ruy) Gutierrez de Cevallos,
including, if I read it right on scanning, a claim that certain
properties of the Cevallos had previously been among those held by
Ramiro III.
It then follows with Gonzalo Ruiz, Ruy Gonzalez, Diego Gonzalez,
Gonzalo Diaz, Ruy Gonzalez, and finally Diego Gutierrez, Sancha's
great grandfather. As I have expressed here before, there is
something flaky about the de Cevallos descent given here.
Memorial genealogico al Rei N. S. **** Don Juan Joseph de Cevallos
Ribera y Davalos, Conde de las Torres, &c. 1770.
http://books.google.com/books?id=JXcOAAAAQAAJ
taf
|
