On Jul 2, 4:31=A0am, Matthew Connolly <mvernonconno...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Jul 2, 12:28=A0am, "al...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <al...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> > See: [...]=A0Visitation (Warwick****re,
> > 1619+1682-3, Ferrers of Tamworth Castle).
>
> > I have not seen any evidence that Sir Humphrey Ferrers (d. 1608) had a
> > son Richard.
>
> Indeed the 1619 Visitation (Harl. Soc. xii (1887) p.7) gives Sir
> Humphrey the following sons: Sir John, Thomas, Walter and Edward; also
> four named daughters. It seems highly unlikely that any other son who
> had lived to have issue would be omitted from the list.
>
> Likewise, the pedigree of the Baddesley Clinton line on p.5, although
> more skeletal, gives an Edward Ferrers "borne 1584" with one sister
> who dsp.; it would be odd to mention her but not a brother. (Tamworth
> and Baddesley are conflated in the account relayed by Rob but are
> different places and branches of the family.)
I'm thinking maybe Richard came from either Thomas, Walter, Edward or
Sir John, however, there's Richard mentioned with 2 sons (from Sir
John de Ferrers and Maude Stanley). If there's Richard, we may assume
that one of his two sons may be named Richard.
|
