On Jul 4, 4:52 pm, wjhonson <wjhon...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 4:43 pm, jhiggins...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
> > The pedigree of Montgomery of Sherington in the 1634 Visitation of
> > Bucks (HSP v. 58) is very short (3 generations or so) and does not
> > mention an Anne Montgomery or any Smiths.
>
> > You might find something on this family in Lipscomb's "History and
> > Antiquities of Buckingham****re".
>
> Thanks.
> and Poooooooooooooop
>
> Herehttp://www.southfarm.plus.com/visitation/Smith_of_Bosworth.pdf
> is what the Vis Leics 1619 says
> that Anne Smith m Sherrington Montgomerie of Sherrington which is in
> Bucks
>
> and then Lincoln****re Pedigrees
herehttp://books.google.com/books?id=aPcMAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA438
> Lincoln****re Pedigrees, by A.R. Maddison, Vol II "Hales of Lincoln",
> page 438
>
> says that Anne Montgomery, dau of Sherrington
> married Richard Halford of Edith Weston
>
> The time periods involved *could* make these two fit together and
> it would be easy to see how a daughter could be named "Anne" after her
> mother
> BUT these too much missing here to be absolutely sure.
>
> Will Johnson
FWIW, the pedigree I cited ends with the following individual:
"Sherington Montgomery a da. and h." [sic]. It was not immediately
clear to me whether "da. and h." referred to Sherrington (the British
do have a quirk of using surnames as given names even for their
daughters!) or to his daughter. But perhaps the "da. and h." refers
to the Anne who mar. Richard Halford.
Sherington [sic] is shown as the child of William Montgomery of
Sherington and his wife Margaret, dau. of Robert Belcher of Lam****t,
Lanca****re. William is shown as the son of Michael Montgomery of
Sherrington [sic].
|
