Hi, Cheryl
I think you may have misread what AEP was saying. He was agreeing
with you. He was saying that when we get beyond proofs, we work
with every clue we can find, and draw our best reasonable
conclusions, which are a kind of 'logical leap of faith', the stress
on the 'logical' bit.
We keep looking and analyzing, and not assuming 'facts', but that
when the facts just plain run out, our most-likely possibility is
the 'logical leap of faith' necessary. At least until some other
bit of information is found.
It was not a matter of 'his reasonable conclusion' and 'your leap of
faith'. We were all on the same page here.
Linda S
leoandlinda <leoandlinda@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
