>>>>>FamilySearch.org has wiki, forums now.
>>>>>
>>>>>"James W Anderson" <jander7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>
>>>>...I'm not so certain that's a good thing....
>>>>
>>>>D. Stussy <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>
>>>Nice thing about a wiki, is that it's a real-time manifestation of
>>>the peer review process. Bad entries are improved, good entries
>>>are improved, and vandalism is evident and easily corrected.
>>>
>>>Dave Hinz
>>
>>Uhhh, but whether one used a wiki or a guest book or something else
>>instead, the question of the necessity of the duplicative content
>>remains?
>>
>>Cheryl Singhals <singhals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Please explain why you think Wiki's duplicate content is any
> different from the countless duplications that already exist.
>
> Bill
Because it's (a) newer and (b) from an organization that ought to be
aware of the multiple other similar resources it's duplicating.
It's NOT because it's out of SLC. It would be needlessly
duplicative if it were from the DAR, the UDC, or the Mayflower
Society.
Cheryl
singhals <singhals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
