<snip>
>
>
> The objection is not to the WIKI part of it -- the objection is to
> yet-another-central-depository.
>
> The objection is not to the LDS doing it -- the objection is to
> yet-another-central-depository.
>
> The object is not to whether this is better'n that -- the objection
> is to yet-another-central-depository.
>
> Again -- the objection is to yet-another-central-depository.
>
<snip>
> *THAT'S* what we're objecting to. Or at least, that's what /I'm/
> objecting to here.
>
> Cheryl Singhals <singhals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
So, what you're saying is, for example, that because Ancestry has
multiple unique databases - for which you must pay for access -
there's no reason for other entities to have or develop similar
databases .. after all, that'd be another central-repository.
'Scuse me, but I think not. Yeah, y'gotta look in more than one
place to find information, sometimes there's some question about
just which version of a do***ent is the "real thing". I can only
speak for myself, but I'd much rather have multiple places to poke
around in, more than one point of view, especially WRT wikis, and
the essential freedom to make up my own mind as to the validity and
appropriateness of a given piece of evidence.
Swell Ol' Bob
--
Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
-----
Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is the probable
reason so few engage in it. -- Henry Ford
Bob Melson <melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
