It's ok,
I do understand your means.
thanks for reply.
Arnold
"singhals" <singhals@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:HP2dnXNgF9lgrUrYnZ2dnUVZ_rCsnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I hate to "pile on", but Robert has said what some of us have been
thinking
>for weeks. Once a month, on s.g.misc, is one thing; but almost daily on
3
>or 4 different groups is too much. If nothing else, it will SERIOUSLY
>annoy those using a search engine in the archives of the group to get so
>many duplicate hits.
>
> Cheryl [who in the days of fidonet shot herself painfully in the foot
with
> her surname lists!]
>
> Arnold O.Kn. wrote:
>
>> Dear Robert,
>> Thank you for your opinion.
>> My sorry, if my same messages gives you the though that i should be a
>> spammer.
>> Because it's not my intention to be this.
>> The reason for the continually posts is, that it can be possible that
not
>> everyone did
>> read my message, because not everyone is watching this newsplace daily.
>> However, maybe i am wrong in my thinking. (sorry for my bad english)
>> regards
>> arnold
>>
>> "Robert Melson" <melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:2KoBh.2807$Jl.607@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>In article <45d5f9fa$0$4154$ba620dc5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>"Arnold O.Kn." <arthar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>>
>>>>The Knipscheer Family Website.
>>>
>>><snip>>
>>>
>>>Arnold,
>>>
>>>One posting, maybe two or three, would have been enough. To
>>>continually post the same message makes it look like you
>>>might be a spammer. If people haven't gotten your message
>>>by this time, they never will or just are not interested.
>>>
>>>Bob Melson
>>>
>>>--
>>>Robert G. Melson | Rio Grande MicroSolutions | El Paso, Texas
>>>-----
>>>"People unfit for freedom---who cannot do much with it---are
>>>hungry for power." ---Eric Hoffer
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
|
