Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Education > Genealogy, Miscellaneous > Beyond GEDCOM
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 51 Topic 1776 of 1839
Post > Topic >>

Beyond GEDCOM

by Lars Eighner <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 17, 2007 at 05:34 AM

Here is the problem:  GEDCOM has become the de facto standard for family
history and geneology data.  And the problem with that is that the Mormons
own GEDCOM and thus it is rife with built-in religious limitations.

As you might expect, GEDCOM does not allow you to enter a family created
by
same-*** marriage or civil unions even where they are lawful.  But there
are
other limitations.  For example, in GEDCOM 5.xx, an adopted child does not
belong to his family.  When he looks up his family in a GEDCOM-compliant
file, he is not there.  How needlessly hurtful is that?

If a guy marries his 14-year-old cousin as his fifth wife, GEDCOM has no
problem dealing with that kind of family.  But it cannot handle the Brady
Bunch.

Now I suppose you could defend GEDCOM by saying it is supposed to record
only genetic --- that is, biological --- relation****ps.  And of course,
there are im****tant scientific and especially medical uses for that kind
of
information.  But it is not really true that GEDCOM records biological
relation****ps.  It presumes that the husband of a woman who bears a child
is
the father of the child, and we know since there is now DNA testing that
assumption is untrue in a significant ****tion of cases.

Which brings me to my point.  I'd like to develop a family history system
that is as compatible with GEDCOM as possible (since it is, as I have
said,
the de facto standard with tons of software applications), but with
extensions to handle many diverse kinds of families that exist both in
modern America and in many traditional cultures.

So, I would be grateful for any pointers to existing software that handles
all families or suggestions for extensions.


-- 
Lars Eighner     <http://larseighner.com/>
   
<http://myspace.com/larseighner>
                         Countdown: 553 days to go.
Owing to massive spam from googlegroups, I do not see most posts from
there.
 




 51 Posts in Topic:
Beyond GEDCOM
Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2007-07-17 05:34:54 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2007-07-17 09:06:49 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
"the_verminator@[EMA  2007-07-17 09:30:53 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-17 16:39:26 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2007-07-17 17:10:04 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2007-07-17 23:34:42 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-18 01:05:01 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-19 00:04:34 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-17 18:00:30 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-18 01:08:21 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-18 01:00:17 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Ernie Wright <erniew@[  2007-07-17 22:00:22 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 02:07:01 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-07-17 22:50:33 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 03:55:19 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-07-18 00:41:29 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 07:45:07 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-07-18 12:31:00 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2007-07-18 18:19:54 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-07-18 15:43:14 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2007-07-19 09:09:58 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2007-07-19 09:14:11 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
singhals <singhals@[EM  2007-07-21 10:56:29 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-18 23:58:02 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2007-07-19 10:22:08 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2007-07-18 17:50:32 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-18 23:51:48 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-19 07:51:33 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2007-07-20 18:39:44 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2007-07-18 08:47:20 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2007-07-18 14:05:21 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 05:07:44 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Denis Beauregard <deni  2007-07-18 01:28:44 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
David Harper <devnull@  2007-07-18 19:07:36 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2007-07-19 09:00:00 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Peter J Seymour <moz@[  2007-07-19 09:13:07 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Ian Goddard <goddai01@  2007-07-19 10:24:39 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-19 16:42:12 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2007-07-19 18:06:14 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
"the_verminator@[EMA  2007-07-18 12:47:11 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
singhals <singhals@[EM  2007-07-18 17:26:51 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-19 07:51:29 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 20:53:11 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
"the_verminator@[EMA  2007-07-19 15:58:31 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-19 23:29:52 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Wes Groleau <groleau+n  2007-07-20 01:50:46 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
"the_verminator@[EMA  2007-07-19 18:47:12 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-20 02:28:10 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
mojaveg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-20 11:12:29 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
Hugh Watkins <hugh.wat  2007-07-21 05:12:51 
Re: Beyond GEDCOM
melsonr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-20 19:39:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 9 4:22:12 CDT 2008.